Yesterday’s tax bill proposes a new provision saying “a fee charged for the late payment of an account” is treated as subject to GST.
It will be back dated to 2003 to prevent the Government being inundated with refund claims.
My issue is with the drafting. It applies to “late payment fees” but according to the commentary does not apply to “penalty or default interest”. Yet there’s nothing in the proposal to help taxpayers determine the difference.
I’ve been thinking through some examples and frankly I don’t think it’s always obvious when something is a “fee” for late payment and when something might be a “penalty” for late payment. There are no relevant definitions in the legislation.
If the IRD is not careful this could backfire on them. On a literal interpretation of the new provision it seems to me there’s a more than reasonable argument it applies to IRD “late payment penalties” under the Tax Administration Act. These penalties are not “interest” because use of money interest is imposed under different sections in addition to late payment penalties. When they were introduced we were told late payment penalties recognised the extra administrative costs incurred by the department when taxpayers paid their tax accounts late. That description is amazingly similar to the language in the Official’s Commentary on the new bill which talks about a late payment fee representing the “cost of administering the late payment”.
If IRD late payment penalties are subject to GST then businesses who have incurred them over the last few years might be entitled to ask the IRD for a tax invoice once this legislation is enacted and claim an input tax credit for the GST component.
This is a classic sledgehammer to crack a nut and needs more thought.
Barrister, Director and Consultant specialising in tax, family enterprise governance and succession, helping start ups and entrepreneurial enterprises grow safely and international expert on value added tax policy and implementation.